-
(인문학) 세계인권선언 全文 (Full Text of Universal Declaration of Human Rights)사람되기/인문학 2018. 2. 20. 22:37
<밝은 하늘>
아래의 자료 <Universal Declaration of Human Rights 세계인권선언>은 노암 촘스키의 <불량국가(Rogue States)>를 읽다가 대체 어떤 내용의 선언인가 궁금해져서 인터넷을 검색해 찾았다.
이 세계인권선언은 1948년 12월10일 유엔총회(the United Nations General Assembly) 제3회기에서 Resolution 217(결의안 217)로 비준되었다. 당시 개표현황을 보면, 당시 58개 회원국 중, 찬성이 48개국, 반대는 없었고, 기권은 8개국, 투표불참이 2개국이었다. 한국은 1991년 북한과 함께 유엔에 가입하였다. 현재 유엔 회원국은 193개국이다.
출처: https://amnesty.or.kr/resource/%EC%84%B8%EA%B3%84%EC%9D%B8%EA%B6%8C%EC%84%A0%EC%96%B8/
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
세계인권선언
인류사회의 모든 구성원이 갖는 고유한 존엄과 평등하고도 양도할 수 없는 권리를 승인함은 세계의 자유, 정의와 평화의 기초이기에,
인권 무시와 멸시는 인류의 양심을 짓밟는 만행을 초래하였으며, 언론과 신앙의 자유 그리고 공포와 결핍 없는 세계의 도래는 사람들의 최고의 소망으로 선언되어 왔기에,
인간이 전제와 탄압에 저항하는 최후의 수단으로 반란을 일으키지 않도록 하기 위하여 법의 지배에 의해 인권을 보장하는 것이 필수적이기에,
여러 국가 사이의 우호적 관계의 발전을 증진시키는 것이 필수적이기에,
유엔의 여러 국민들은 유엔헌장에서 기본적 인권, 인간의 존엄과 가치, 그리고 남녀의 평등권에 대한 믿음을 재확인하고, 더욱 광범한 자유 중에서 사회적 진보와 생활수준 향상을 촉진하고자 결의하였기에,
가입국은 유엔과 협력하여 인권과 기본적 자유의 보편적인 존중 및 준수의 촉진을 이루어내고자 서약하였기에,
이러한 권리와 자유에 대한 공통된 이해는 그러한 서약의 완전한 실현에 가장 중요한 것이므로,
따라서 이에 국제연합 총회는,
사회의 모든 개인과 기관이 이 세계인권선언을 항상 마음에 새기면서, 가입국 자신의 인민들과 자국의 통치하에 있는 인민에게도 이들 권리와 자유의 존중을 교육을 통하여 촉진하는 일 및 그 보편적이고 효과적인 승인과 준수를 확보하도록 국내적 및 국제적인 점진적 조치를 통하여 확보하기 위하여 노력하도록, 모든 인민과 모든 국가가 이룩해야 할 공통의 기준으로 이 세계인권선언을 공포한다.
제 1조
모든 사람은 태어나면서부터 자유롭고, 존엄과 권리에 있어 평등하다. 모든 사람은 이성과 양심을 타고났으며 서로 동포의 정신으로 행동하여야 한다.
제 2조
1. 모든 사람은 인종, 피부색, 성, 언어, 종교, 정치적 또는 기타의 의견, 국민적 또는 사회적 출신, 재산, 출생 또는 이들과 유사한 그 어떠한 이유에 의해서도 차별을 받지 않고 이 선언에 규정된 모든 권리와 자유를 누릴 수 있다.
2. 나아가 개인이 속하는 국가 또는 지역이 독립국이든 신탁통치 지역이든 비자치 지역이든, 또는 어떤 주권제한 하에 있든지, 그 국가 또는 지역의 정치적, 사법적 또는 국제적인 지위에 근거하는 어떤 차별도 받지 않는다.
제 3조
모든 사람은 생명, 자유 및 신체의 안전에 대한 권리를 가진다.
제 4조
누구도 노예가 되거나 괴로운 노역을 강요당하지 않는다. 노예제도와 노예매매는 어떤 형태로든 금지된다.
제 5조
누구도 고문 또는 잔인하고 비인도적이며 모욕적인 취급 또는 형벌을 받지 않는다.
제 6조
모든 사람은 어디에서나 법 앞의 인격으로 인정받을 권리를 가진다.
제 7조
모든 사람은 법앞에 평등하며, 아무런 차별 없이 법의 동등한 보호를 받을 수 있다. 모든 사람은 이 선언을 위반하는 어떤 차별로부터도, 또한 그러한 차별을 부추기는 어떤 행위로부터도 평등한 보호를 받을 권리를 가진다.
제 8조
모든 사람은 헌법 또는 법률에 의해 부여된 기본적인 권리를 침해하는 행위에 대하여, 권한을 가진 국내법원으로부터 유효한 구제를 받을 수 있는 권리를 가진다.
제 9조
아무도 자의적인 체포, 구금 및 추방을 당하지 않는다.
제 10조
모든 사람은 자신의 권리와 의무 및 자신에 대한 형사책임이 결정될 때에 독립된 공평한 법원에 의해 공정한 공개 심리를 받는 데 있어 완전히 평등한 권리를 가진다.
제 11조
1. 범죄의 소추를 받은 사람은 누구나 자신을 변호하는 데 필요한 모든 것을 보장받는 공개재판을 통하여 법률에 따라 유죄가 입증될 때까지 무죄로 추정될 권리를 가진다.
2. 누구도 행위 시에 국내법 또는 국제법에 의해 범죄를 구성하지 않은 작위나 부작위로 인하여 유죄가 되지 않는다. 또한 범죄가 행해진 때의 형벌보다 더 무거운 형벌을 받지 않는다.
제 12조
누구도 자신의 개인적인 일, 가족, 주거 또는 통신에 대하여 함부러 간섭받거나 명예 및 신용에 대하여 공격을 받지 않는다.
모든 사람은 이러한 간섭이나 공격에 대하여 법의 보호를 받을 권리를 가진다.
제 13조
1. 모든 사람은 각국의 경계 내에서 자유롭게 이전하고 거주할 권리를 가진다.
2. 모든 사람은 자국이나 다른 나라를 떠나거나 자국에 돌아갈 권리를 가진다.
제 14조
1. 모든 사람은 박해를 피하여 타국에 피난처를 구하고 체재할 권리를 가진다.
2. 이 권리는 비정치적 범죄 또는 국제연합의 목적 및 원칙에 반하는 행위만을 원인으로 하는 소추의 경우에는 원용될 수 없다.
제 15조
1. 누구에게나 국적을 가질 권리가 있다.
2. 누구나 자의적으로 국적을 박탈당하거나 국적을 변경할 권리를 거부당하지 않는다.
제 16조
1. 성년 남녀는 인종, 국적 또는 종교에 의한 어떤 제한도 받지 않고 혼인하며 가정을 만들 권리를 가진다. 그들은 혼인기간 중 또는 그것을 해소할 시에 혼인에 관하여 평등한 권리를 가진다.
2. 혼인은 그 의사를 가진 양 당사자의 자유롭고 완전한 합의에 의해서만 성립된다.
3. 가정은 사회의 자연적이고 기초적인 집단 단위로서 사회와 국가의 보호를 받는다.
제 17조
1. 모든 사람은 단독으로 또는 타인과 공동하여 재산을 소유할 권리를 가진다.
2. 누구나 자의적으로 자신의 재산을 빼앗기지 않는다.
제 18조
모든 사람은 사상, 양심 및 종교의 자유를 누릴 권리를 가진다. 이 권리는 종교 또는 신념을 바꿀 자유, 단독 또는 타인과 공동하여 공적 또는 사적으로 포교, 행사, 예배 및 의식을 통하여 종교나 신념을 표명할 자유를 포함한다.
제 19조
모든 사람은 의견과 표현의 자유를 누릴 권리를 가진다. 이 권리는 간섭을 받지 않고 자신의 의견을 가질 자유를 포함하며, 또한 모든 수단을 통하여, 국경을 넘거나 넘지 않거나에 관계없이, 정보와 사상을 추구하고 받고 전할 자유를 포함한다.
제 20조
1. 모든 사람은 평화적인 집회 및 결사의 자유를 누릴 권리를 가진다.
2. 누구도 결사에 소속할 것을 강요받지 않는다.
제 21조
1. 모든 사람은 직접 또는 자유롭게 선출된 대표자를 통하여 자국의 정치에 참여할 권리를 가진다.
2. 모든 사람은 자국에서 평등하게 공무를 담당할 권리를 가진다.
3. 인민의 의사는 통치권력의 기초가 되어야 한다. 이 의사는 정기적이고 진정한 선거에 의해 표명되어야 한다. 이 선거는 평등한 보통선거에 의한 것이어야 하고 비밀투표 또는 그것과 동등한 자유가 보장되는 투표절차에 의해 치러져야 한다.
제 22조
모든 사람은 사회의 일원으로서 사회보장을 받을 권리를 가지며 국가적 노력 및 국제적 협력에 의해 또한 각국의 조직 및 자원에 따라 자신의 존엄과 자신의 인격의 자유로운 발전에 불가결한 경제적, 사회적 및 문화적 권리의 실현을 요구할 권리를 가진다.
제 23조
1. 모든 사람은 노동할 권리, 직업을 자유롭게 선택할 권리, 공정하고 유리한 노동조건을 확보할 권리, 실업으로부터 보호받을 권리를 가진다.
2. 모든 사람은 어떤 차별도 받지 않고 동등한 노동에 대하여 동등한 보수를 받을 권리를 가진다.
3. 모든 노동자는 자신과 가족이 인간의 존엄에 적합한 생활을 할 수 있는 공정하고 유리한 보수를 받고, 나아가 필요한 경우에는 다른 사회적 보호수단에 의해 보충받을 권리를 가진다.
4. 모든 사람은 자신의 이익을 보호하기 위하여 노동조합을 조직하고 또한 그것에 가입할 권리를 가진다.
제 24조
모든 사람은 노동시간의 합리적인 제한과 정기적 유급휴가를 포함하여 휴식 및 여가를 누릴 권리를 가진다.
제 25조
1. 모든 사람은 의식주, 의료 및 필요한 사회복지에 의해 자신과 가족의 건강 및 복지에 충분한 생활수준을 유지할 권리를 가지며, 실업, 질병, 심신장애, 배우자의 사망, 노령 기타 불가항력에 의한 생활불능의 경우에는 보장을 받을 권리를 가진다.
2. 어머니와 어린이는 특별한 보호와 원조를 받을 권리를 가진다.
모든 어린이는 적출 여부에 관계없이 동일한 사회적 보호를 받는다.
제 26조
1. 모든 사람은 교육을 받을 권리를 가진다. 교육은 적어도 초등과 기초적 단계에서는 무상이어야 한다. 초등교육은 의무적이어야 한다. 기술교육과 직업교육은 일반인이 이용할 수 있어야 하며 고등교육은 능력에 따라 모든 사람에게 동등하게 열려 있어야 한다.
2. 교육은 인격의 충분한 발전과 인권 및 기본적 자유의 존중을 강화할 것을 목적으로 하여야 한다. 교육은 모든 나라, 인종적 또는 종교적 집단 상호간의 이해, 관용 및 우호관계를 증진하는 것이어야 하고, 평화의 유지를 위하여 국제연합의 활동을 촉진하는 것이어야 한다.
3. 부모는 자녀에게 주는 교육의 종류를 선택하는 데 있어 우선적 권리를 가진다.
제 27조
1. 모든 사람은 그 사회의 문화생활에 자유롭게 참여하고 예술을 즐기며 과학의 진보와 그 혜택을 공유할 권리를 가진다.
2. 모든 사람은 자신이 창작한 과학적, 문화적 또는 예술적 작품에서 생기는 정신적 및 물질적 이익을 보호받을 권리를 가진다.
제 28조
모든 사람은 이 선언에서 제시된 권리와 자유가 완전하게 실현될 사회적 및 국제적 질서에 대한 권리를 가진다.
제 29조
1. 모든 사람은 그 인격의 자유롭고 완전한 발전이 그 사회 속에서만 가능한, 그런 사회를 만들어 나갈 의무를 진다.
2. 모든 사람은 자신의 권리와 자유를 행사함에 있어서, 타인의 권리와 자유의 정당한 승인 및 존중을 보장하고 민주사회의 도덕, 공공질서 및 일반적 복지의 정당한 요구를 만족시키는 것만을 목적으로 하여 법률로써 정해진 제한에만 복종한다.
3. 이러한 권리와 자유는 어떤 경우에도 국제연합의 목적과 원칙에 반하여 행사할 수 없다.
제 30조
이 선언의 모든 규정은, 어떤 나라나 집단 또는 개인에 대하여 이 선언에 열거된 권리와 자유의 파괴를 목적으로 하는 활동에 종사하거나 또는 그러한 목적의 행위를 할 권리를 인정한다고 해석되어서는 안 된다.
번역: 조효제 (성공회대학교 사회과학부 교수)
출처/원문보기: http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a milestone document in the history of human rights. Drafted by representatives with different legal and cultural backgrounds from all regions of the world, the Declaration was proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 (General Assembly resolution 217 A) as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations. It sets out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected and it has been translated into over 500 languages.
Preamble
Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,
Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,
Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,
Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,
Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,
Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,
Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,
Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.
Article 1.
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Article 2.
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
Article 3.
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
Article 4.
No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.
Article 5.
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Article 6.
Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.
Article 7.
All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
Article 8.
Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.
Article 9.
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.
Article 10.
Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Article 11.
(1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
(2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.Article 12.
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
Article 13.
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.Article 14.
(1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
(2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.Article 15.
(1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.Article 16.
(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
(2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.Article 17.
(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.Article 18.
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Article 20.
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
(2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.Article 21.
(1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
(2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.
(3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.Article 22.
Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.
Article 23.
(1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
(2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
(3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
(4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.Article 24.
Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.
Article 25.
(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
(2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.Article 26.
(1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
(2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
(3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.Article 27.
(1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.
(2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.Article 28.
Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.
Article 29.
(1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
(2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
(3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.Article 30.
Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.
원문보기(=출처): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Universal Declaration of Human Rights Eleanor Roosevelt with the Spanish language version of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.Created 1948 Ratified 10 December 1948 Location Palais de Chaillot, Paris Author(s) Draft Committee[a] Purpose Human rights Poster The human rights adopted by the United Nations General Assembly of its 183rd meeting, held in Paris on 10 December 1948Rights Theoretical distinctions Human rights Rights by beneficiary Other groups of rights The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a historic document that was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly at its third session on 10 December 1948 as Resolution 217 at the Palais de Chaillot in Paris, France. Of the then 58 members of the United Nations, 48 voted in favor, none against, eight abstained, and two did not vote.
The Declaration consists of 30 articles affirming an individual's rights which, although not legally binding in themselves, have been elaborated in subsequent international treaties, economic transfers, regional human rights instruments, national constitutions, and other laws. The Declaration was the first step in the process of formulating the International Bill of Human Rights, which was completed in 1966, and came into force in 1976, after a sufficient number of countries had ratified them.
Some legal scholars have argued that because countries have constantly invoked the Declaration over more than 50 years, it has become binding as a part of customary international law.[1][2] However, in the United States, the Supreme Court in Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain (2004), concluded that the Declaration "does not of its own force impose obligations as a matter of international law."[3] Courts of other countries have also concluded that the Declaration is not in itself part of domestic law.
Contents
[hide]Structure and content[edit]
The underlying structure of the Universal Declaration was introduced in its second draft, which was prepared by René Cassin. Cassin worked from a first draft, which was prepared by John Peters Humphrey. The structure was influenced by the Code Napoléon, including a preamble and introductory general principles.[4] Cassin compared the Declaration to the portico of a Greek temple, with a foundation, steps, four columns, and a pediment.
Wikisource has original text related to this article: The Declaration consists of a preamble and thirty articles:
- The preamble sets out the historical and social causes that led to the necessity of drafting the Declaration.
- Articles 1—2 established the basic concepts of dignity, liberty, equality, and brotherhood.
- Articles 3—11 established other individual rights, such as the right to life and the prohibition of slavery.
- Articles 6—11 refer to the fundamental legality of human rights with specific remedies cited for their defence when violated.
- Articles 12–17 established the rights of the individual towards the community (including such things as freedom of movement).
- Articles 18–21 sanctioned the so-called "constitutional liberties", and with spiritual, public, and political freedoms, such as freedom of thought, opinion, religion and conscience, word, and peaceful association of the individual.
- Articles 22–27 sanctioned an individual's economic, social and cultural rights, including healthcare. Article 25 states: "Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services." It also makes additional accommodations for security in case of physical debilitation or disability, and makes special mention of care given to those in motherhood or childhood.[5]
- Articles 28—30 established the general ways of using these rights, the areas in which these rights of the individual can not be applied, and that they can not be overcome against the individual.
These articles are concerned with the duty of the individual to society and the prohibition of use of rights in contravention of the purposes of the United Nations Organisation.[6]
History[edit]
Background[edit]
Franklin Delano Roosevelt's 6 January 1941 State of the Union addressintroducing the theme of the Four Freedoms (starting at 32:02)
Problems playing this file? See media help.During World War II, the Allies adopted the Four Freedoms—freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom from fear, and freedom from want—as their basic war aims. The United Nations Charter "reaffirmed faith in fundamental human rights, and dignity and worth of the human person" and committed all member states to promote "universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion".[7]
When the racist atrocities committed by Nazi Germany became fully apparent after World War II, the consensus within the world community was that the United Nations Charter did not sufficiently define the rights to which it referred.[8][9] A universal declaration that specified the rights of individuals was necessary to give effect to the Charter's provisions on human rights.[10]
Creation and drafting[edit]
In June 1946, the UN Economic and Social Council established the Commission on Human Rights, comprising 18 members from various nationalities and political backgrounds. The Commission, a standing body of the United Nations, was constituted to undertake the work of preparing what was initially conceived as an International Bill of Rights.[11]
The Commission established a special Universal Declaration of Human Rights Drafting Committee, chaired by Eleanor Roosevelt, to write the articles of the Declaration. The Committee met in two sessions over the course of two years.
Canadian John Peters Humphrey, Director of the Division of Human Rights within the United Nations Secretariat, was called upon by the United Nations Secretary-General to work on the project and became the Declaration's principal drafter.[12] At the time, Humphrey was newly appointed as Director of the Division of Human Rights within the United Nations Secretariat.[13]
Other well-known members of the drafting committee included René Cassin of France, Charles Malik of Lebanon, P. C. Chang of the Republic of China (Taiwan).[14] Humphrey provided the initial draft which became the working text of the Commission.
According to Allan Carlson, the Declaration's pro-family phrases were the result of the Christian Democratic movement's influence on Cassin and Malik.[15]
Once the Committee finished its work in May 1948, the draft was further discussed by the Commission on Human Rights, the Economic and Social Council, the Third Committee of the General Assembly before being put to vote in December 1948. During these discussions many amendments and propositions were made by UN Member States.[16]
British representatives were extremely frustrated that the proposal had moral but no legal obligation.[17] (It was not until 1976 that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights came into force, giving a legal status to most of the Declaration.)
Adoption[edit]
The Universal Declaration was adopted by the General Assembly as Resolution 217 on 10 December 1948. Of the then 58 members[18] of the United Nations, 48 voted in favor, none against, eight abstained[19][20] and Honduras and Yemen failed to vote or abstain.[21]
The meeting record[22] provides first hand insight of the debate. South Africa's position can be seen as an attempt to protect its system of apartheid, which clearly violated any number of articles in the Declaration.[19] The Saudi Arabian delegation's abstention was prompted primarily by two of the Declaration's articles: Article 18, which states that everyone has the right "to change his religion or belief"; and Article 16, on equal marriage rights.[19] The six communist countries abstentions centred around the view that the Declaration did not go far enough in condemning fascism and Nazism.[23] Eleanor Roosevelt attributed the abstention of Soviet bloc countries to Article 13, which provided the right of citizens to leave their countries.[24]
The 48 countries which voted in favour of the Declaration are:[25]
- Afghanistan
- Argentina
- Australia
- Belgium
- Bolivia
- Brazil
- Burma
- Canada[a]
- Chile
- China
- Colombia
- Costa Rica
- Cuba
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- Egypt
- El Salvador
- Ethiopia
- France
- Greece
- Guatemala
- Haiti
- Iceland
- India
- Iran
- Iraq
- Lebanon
- Liberia
- Luxembourg
- Mexico
- Netherlands
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
- Norway
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Paraguay
- Peru
- Philippines
- Thailand
- Sweden
- Syria
- Turkey
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Uruguay
- Venezuela
- a. ^ Despite the central role played by the Canadian John Peters Humphrey, the Canadian Government at first abstained from voting on the Declaration's draft, but later voted in favor of the final draft in the General Assembly.[26]
8 countries abstained:[25]
- Byelorussian SSR (Byelorussia)
- Czechoslovakia
- Poland
- Saudi Arabia
- Soviet Union
- Ukrainian SSR (Ukraine)
- Union of South Africa
- Yugoslavia
Other countries only gained sovereignty and joined the United Nations later,[27] which explains the relatively small number of states entitled to the historical vote and in no way reflects opposition to the universal principles.
International Human Rights Day[edit]
The Declaration is commemorated each year on 10 December, the anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration, and is known as Human Rights Day or International Human Rights Day. The commemoration is observed by individuals, community and religious groups, human rights organizations, parliaments, governments, and the United Nations. Decadal commemorations are often accompanied by campaigns to promote awareness of the Declaration and human rights. 2008 marked the 60th anniversary of the Declaration, and was accompanied by year-long activities around the theme "Dignity and justice for all of us".[28]
Significance and legal effect[edit]
Significance[edit]
In 1948, the UN Resolution A/RES/217(III)[A] adopted the Declaration on a bilingual document in English and French, and official translations in Chinese, Russian and Spanish.[29] In 2009, the Guinness Book of Records described the Declaration as the world's "Most Translated Document" (370 different languages and dialects).[30][31] The Unicode Consortium stores 431[32] of the 503[33]official translations available at the OHCHR (as of June 2017).
In its preamble, governments commit themselves and their people to progressive measures which secure the universal and effective recognition and observance of the human rights set out in the Declaration. Eleanor Roosevelt supported the adoption of the Declaration as a declaration rather than as a treaty because she believed that it would have the same kind of influence on global society as the United States Declaration of Independence had within the United States.[citation needed] In this, she proved to be correct. Even though it is not legally binding, the Declaration has been adopted in or has influenced most national constitutions since 1948. It has also served as the foundation for a growing number of national laws, international laws, and treaties, as well as for a growing number of regional, sub national, and national institutions protecting and promoting human rights.
For the first time in international law, the term “the rule of law” was used in the preamble of the Declaration. The third paragraph of the preamble of the Declaration reads as follows: "Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law."[34]
Legal effect[edit]
While not a treaty itself, the Declaration was explicitly adopted for the purpose of defining the meaning of the words "fundamental freedoms" and "human rights" appearing in the United Nations Charter, which is binding on all member states. For this reason, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a fundamental constitutive document of the United Nations. In addition, many international lawyers[35] believe that the Declaration forms part of customary international law[36] and is a powerful tool in applying diplomatic and moral pressure to governments that violate any of its articles. The 1968 United Nations International Conference on Human Rights advised that the Declaration "constitutes an obligation for the members of the international community" to all persons. The Declaration has served as the foundation for two binding UN human rights covenants: the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The principles of the Declaration are elaborated in international treaties such as the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the International Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, the United Nations Convention Against Torture, and many more. The Declaration continues to be widely cited by governments, academics, advocates, and constitutional courts, and by individuals who appeal to its principles for the protection of their recognised human rights.
Reaction[edit]
Praise[edit]
The Universal Declaration has received praise from a number of notable people. The Lebanese philosopher and diplomat Charles Malik called it "an international document of the first order of importance",[37] while Eleanor Roosevelt—first chairwoman of the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) that drafted the Declaration—stated that it "may well become the international Magna Carta of all men everywhere."[38] In a speech on 5 October 1995, Pope John Paul II called the Declaration one of the highest expressions of the human conscience of our time" but the Vatican never adopted the Declaration.[39] In a statement on 10 December 2003 on behalf of the European Union, Marcello Spatafora said that the Declaration "placed human rights at the centre of the framework of principles and obligations shaping relations within the international community."[citation needed]
Criticism[edit]
Islamic countries[edit]
Turkey— which was a secular state with an overwhelmingly Muslim population—signed the Declaration in 1948.[40] However, the same year, Saudi Arabia abstained from the ratification vote on the Declaration, claiming that it violated Sharia law.[41] Pakistan—which had signed the declaration—disagreed and critiqued the Saudi position.[42] Pakistani minister Muhammad Zafarullah Khanstrongly argued in favor of including freedom of religion.[43] In 1982, the Iranian representative to the United Nations, Said Rajaie-Khorassani, said that the Declaration was "a secular understanding of the Judeo-Christian tradition" which could not be implemented by Muslims without conflict with Sharia.[44] On 30 June 2000, members of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (now the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation) officially resolved to support the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam,[45] an alternative document that says people have "freedom and right to a dignified life in accordance with the Islamic Shari'ah", without any discrimination on grounds of "race, colour, language, sex, religious belief, political affiliation, social status or other considerations".
Some Muslim diplomats would go on later to help draft other UN human rights treaties. For example, Iraqi diplomat Bedia Afnan's insistence on wording that recognized gender equality resulted in Article 3 within the ICCPR and ICESCR. Pakistani diplomat Shaista Suhrawardy Ikramullah also spoke in favor of recognizing women's rights.[43]
A number of scholars in different fields have expressed concerns with the Declaration's alleged Western bias. These include Irene Oh, Abdulaziz Sachedina, Riffat Hassan, and Faisal Kutty. Hassan has argued:
Irene Oh argues that one solution is to approach the issue from the perspective of comparative (descriptive) ethics.[47]
Kutty writes: "A strong argument can be made that the current formulation of international human rights constitutes a cultural structure in which western society finds itself easily at home ... It is important to acknowledge and appreciate that other societies may have equally valid alternative conceptions of human rights."[48]
Ironically, a number of Islamic countries that as of 2014 are among the most resistant to UN intervention in domestic affairs, played an invaluable role in the creation of the Declaration, with countries such as Syria and Egypt having been strong proponents of the universality of human rights and the right of countries to self-determination.[49]
"The Right to Refuse to Kill"[edit]
Groups such as Amnesty International[50] and War Resisters International[51] have advocated for "The Right to Refuse to Kill" to be added to the Universal Declaration. War Resisters International has stated that the right to conscientious objection to military service is primarily derived from—but not yet explicit in—Article 18 of the UDHR: the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion.[51]
Steps have been taken within the United Nations to make this right more explicit, but —to date (2017)— those steps have been limited to less significant United Nations documents. Sean MacBride—Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations and Nobel Peace Prize laureate—has said: "To the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights one more might, with relevance, be added. It is 'The Right to Refuse to Kill'."[52]
American Anthropological Association[edit]
The American Anthropological Association criticized the UDHR while it was in its drafting process. The AAA warned that the document would be defining universal rights from a Western paradigm which would be unfair to countries outside of that scope. They further argued that the West's history of colonialism and evangelism made them a problematic moral representative for the rest of the world. They proposed three notes for consideration with underlying themes of cultural relativism: "1. The individual realizes his personality through his culture, hence respect for individual differences entails a respect for cultural differences", "2. Respect for differences between cultures is validated by the scientific fact that no technique of qualitatively evaluating cultures has been discovered", and "3. Standards and values are relative to the culture from which they derive so that any attempt to formulate postulates that grow out of the beliefs or moral codes of one culture must to that extent detract from the applicability of any Declaration of Human Rights to mankind as a whole."[53]
Bangkok Declaration[edit]
During the lead up to the World Conference on Human Rights held in 1993, ministers from Asian states adopted the Bangkok Declaration, reaffirming their governments' commitment to the principles of the United Nations Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. They stated their view of the interdependence and indivisibility of human rights and stressed the need for universality, objectivity, and non-selectivity of human rights. However, at the same time, they emphasized the principles of sovereignty and non-interference, calling for greater emphasis on economic, social, and cultural rights—in particular, the right to economic development over civil and political rights. The Bangkok Declaration is considered to be a landmark expression of the Asian values perspective, which offers an extended critique of human rights universalism.[54]
Organizations promoting the UDHR[edit]
This section may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may only interest a specific audience. (November 2017)(Learn how and when to remove this template message)International Federation for Human Rights[edit]
The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) is nonpartisan, nonsectarian, and independent of any government, and its core mandate is to promote respect for all the rights set out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.[55][56]
Amnesty International[edit]
In 1988, director Stephen R. Johnson and 41 international animators, musicians, and producers created a 20-minute video for Amnesty International to celebrate the 40th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration. The video was to bring to life the Declaration's 30 articles.[57]
Amnesty International celebrated Human Rights Day and the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration all over the world by organizing the "Fire Up!" event.[58]
Unitarian Universalist Service Committee[edit]
The Unitarian Universalist Service Committee (UUSC) is a non-profit, nonsectarian organization whose work around the world is guided by the values of Unitarian Universalism and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It works to provide disaster relief and promote human rights and social justice around the world.
Quaker United Nations Office and American Friends Service Committee[edit]
The Quaker United Nations Office and the American Friends Service Committee work on many human rights issues, including improving education on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. They have developed a Curriculum to help introduce High School students to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.[59][60]
American Library Association[edit]
In 1997, the council of the American Library Association (ALA) endorsed Article 19 from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.[61] Along with Article 19, Article 18 and 20 are also fundamentally tied to the ALA Universal Right to Free expression and the Library Bill of Rights.[62] Censorship, the invasion of privacy, and interference of opinions are human rights violations according to the ALA.
Youth for Human Rights International[edit]
Youth for Human Rights International (YHRI) is a non-profit organization founded in 2001 by Mary Shuttleworth, an educator born and raised in apartheid South Africa, where she witnessed firsthand the devastating effects of discrimination and the lack of basic human rights. The purpose of YHRI is to teach youth about human rights, specifically the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and inspire them to become advocates for tolerance and peace. YHRI has now grown into a global movement, including hundreds of groups, clubs and chapters around the world.[63]
See also[edit]
- Human rights
- Non-binding agreements
- Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (1990)
- Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action (1993)
- United Nations Millennium Declaration (2000)
- International human rights law
- Fourth Geneva Convention (1949)
- European Convention on Human Rights (1952)
- Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (1954)
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1969)
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1976)
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1976)
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (1981)
- Convention on the Rights of the Child (1990)
- Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2000)
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2007)
- Thinkers influencing the Declaration
- Charles Malik
- Jacques Maritain
- John Peters Humphrey
- Tommy Douglas
- John Sankey, 1st Viscount Sankey
- Wu Teh Yao
- Peng Chun Chang
- Other
- Slavery in international law
- Slave Trade Acts
- Human rights in China (PRC)
- Command responsibility
- Moral universalism
- Declaration on Great Apes, an as-yet unsuccessful effort to extend some human rights to other great apes.
- "Consent of the governed"
- Racial equality proposal (1919)
- The Farewell Sermon (632 CE)
- Youth for Human Rights International
- List of literary works by number of translations
Notes[edit]
- ^ Included John Peters Humphrey (Canada), René Cassin (France), P. C. Chang (Republic of China), Charles Malik (Lebanon), Hansa Mehta(India) and Eleanor Roosevelt (United States); see Creation and drafting section above.
References[edit]
Citations[edit]
- ^ Henry J Steiner and Philip Alston, International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals, (2nd ed), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
- ^ Hurst Hannum, The UDHR in National and International Law, p.145
- ^ Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692, 734 (2004).
- ^ Glendon 2002, pp. 62–64.
- ^ Universal Declaration of Human Rights, United Nations, 1948
- ^ Glendon 2002, Chapter 10.
- ^ "United Nations Charter, preamble and article 55". United Nations. Retrieved 2013-04-20.
- ^ Cataclysm and World Response in Drafting and Adoption : The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, udhr.org.
- ^ "UDHR50: Didn't Nazi tyranny end all hope for protecting human rights in the modern world?". Udhr.org. 1998-08-28. Retrieved 2012-07-07.
- ^ "UDHR – History of human rights". Universalrights.net. Retrieved 2012-07-07.
- ^ Morsink 1999, p. 4
- ^ Morsink 1999, p. 5
- ^ Morsink 1999, p. 133
- ^ The Declaration was drafted during the Chinese Civil War. P.C. Chang was appointed as a representative by the Republic of China, then the recognised government of China, but which was driven from mainland China and now administers only Taiwanand nearby islands (history.com).
- ^ Carlson, Allan: Globalizing Family Values, 12 January 2004.
- ^ "Drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights". Research Guides. United Nations. Dag Hammarskjöld Library. Retrieved 2015-04-17.
- ^ Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Final authorized text. The British Library. September 1952. Retrieved 16 August 2015.
- ^ "Growth in United Nations membership, 1945-present". www.un.org. Retrieved 2018-02-01.
- ^ ab c CCNMTL. "default". Center for New Media Teaching and Learning (CCNMTL). Columbia University. Retrieved 2013-07-12.
- ^ UNAC. "Questions and answers about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights". United Nations Association in Canada (UNAC). p. "Who are the signatories of the Declaration?". Archived from the original on 2012-09-12.
- ^ Jost Müller-Neuhof (2008-12-10). "Menschenrechte: Die mächtigste Idee der Welt". Der Tagesspiegel (in German). Retrieved 2013-07-12.
- ^ United Nations. "default". Retrieved 2017-08-30.
- ^ Peter Danchin. "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Drafting History - 10. Plenary Session of the Third General Assembly Session". Retrieved 2015-02-25.
- ^ Glendon 2002, pp. 169–70
- ^ ab "Yearbook of the United Nations 1948–1949 p 535"(PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 27, 2013. Retrieved 24 July 2014.
- ^ Schabas, William (1998). "Canada and the Adoption of Universal Declaration of Human Rights" (PDF). McGill Law Journal. 43: 403.
- ^ "OHCHR - Human Rights in the World". www.ohchr.org.
- ^ "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: 1948–2008". United Nations. Retrieved 15 February 2011.
- ^ "A/RES/217(III)". UNBISNET. Retrieved 13 Jun 2017.
- ^ "Most translated document".
- ^ "Universal Declaration of Human Rights". United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
- ^ "UDHR in Unicode - Translations", Unicode, retrieved 8-6-2017
- ^ "Search by Translation", UDHR Translation Project, United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, retrieved 13-8-2017.
- ^ "Universal Declaration of Human Rights". www.un.org. Retrieved 2017-12-07.
- ^ Humphrey JP, "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Its History, Impact and Juridical Character", in Ramcharan BG (ed), Human Rights: Thirty Years After the Universal Declaration (1979) pp. 2l, 37; Sohn 1, "The Human Rights Law of the Charter" (1977) 12 Texas Int LJ 129, 133; McDougal MS, Lasswell H and Chen I, Human Rights and World Public Order (1980) pp. 273–274, 325–327; D'Amato A, International Law: Process and Prospect( 1986) pp. 123–147.
- ^ Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. "Digital record of the UDHR". United Nations.
- ^ "Statement by Charles Malik as Representative of Lebanon to the Third Committee of the UN General Assembly on the Universal Declaration". 6 November 1948. Archived from the original on 28 September 2008.
- ^ Michael E. Eidenmuller (1948-12-09). "Eleanor Roosevelt: Address to the United Nations General Assembly". Americanrhetoric.com. Retrieved 2012-07-07.
- ^ "John Paul II, Address to the U.N., October 2, 1979 and October 5, 1995". Vatican.va. Retrieved 2012-07-07.
- ^ "Universal Declaration of Human Rights". Retrieved 2015-10-30.
- ^ Nisrine Abiad (2008). Sharia, Muslim states and international human rights treaty obligations: a comparative study. BIICL. pp. 60–65. ISBN 978-1-905221-41-7.
- ^ Price 1999, p. 163
- ^ ab Hashemi, Nader and Emran Qureshi. "Human Rights." In The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. Oxford Islamic Studies online.
- ^ Littman, D (February–March 1999). "Universal Human Rights and Human Rights in Islam". Midstream. Archived from the original on 2006-05-01.
- ^ "Resolution No 60/27-P". Organisation of the Islamic Conference. 2000-06-27. Retrieved 2011-06-02.
- ^ "Are Human Rights Compatible with Islam?". religiousconsultation.org. Retrieved 2012-11-12.
- ^ "The Rights of God". Georgetown University Press, 2007.
- ^ "Non-Western Societies Have Influenced Human Rights". in Jacqueline Langwith (ed.), Opposing Viewpoints: Human Rights, Gale/Greenhaven Press: Chicago, 2007.
- ^ Professor Susan Waltz: Universal Rights Group, Syria calls for greater UN intervention in domestic human rights situations....
- ^ Out of the margins: the right to conscientious objection to military service in Europe: An announcement of Amnesty International's forthcoming campaign and briefing for the UN Commission on Human Rights, 31 March 1997. Amnesty International.
- ^ ab A Conscientious Objector's Guide to the UN Human Rights System, Parts 1, 2 & 3, Background Information on International Law for COs, Standards which recognise the right to conscientious objection, War Resisters' International.
- ^ Sean MacBride, The Imperatives of Survival, Nobel Lecture, 12 December 1974, The Nobel Foundation – Official website of the Nobel Foundation. (English index page; hyperlink to Swedish site.) From Nobel Lectures in Peace 1971–1980.
- ^ "Statement on Human Rights" (PDF). Retrieved 2015-10-30.
- ^ "Final Declaration Of The Regional Meeting For Asia Of The World Conference on Human Rights". Law.hku.hk. Retrieved 2012-07-07.
- ^ Contribution to the EU Multi-stakeholder Forum on CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility), 10 February 2009; accessed on 9 November 2009
- ^ Information Partners, web site of the UNHCR, last updated 25 February 2010, 16:08 GMT (web retrieval 25 February 2010, 18:11 GMT)
- ^ "UDHR film". Amnesty International. Retrieved 2013-07-19.
- ^ "Fire Up!". Amnesty International. Retrieved 2013-07-19.
- ^ "UNHCR Partners". UNHCR. Retrieved 11 November 2014.
- ^ "AFSC Universal Declaration of Human Rights web page". American Friends Service Committee. Retrieved 11 November2014.
- ^ "Resolution on IFLA, Human Rights and Freedom of expression". ala.org.
- ^ "The Universal Right to Free expression:". ala.org.
- ^ "Youth for Human Rights". Youth for Human Rights. Retrieved 13 November 2016.
Sources[edit]
- Brown, Gordon (2016). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights in the 21st Century: A Living Document in a Changing World. Open Book Publishers. ISBN 978-1-783-74218-9.
- Glendon, Mary Ann (2002). A world made new: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Random House. ISBN 978-0-375-76046-4.
- Hashmi, Sohail H. (2002). Islamic political ethics: civil society, pluralism, and conflict. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-11310-4.
- Morsink, Johannes (1999). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: origins, drafting, and intent. University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 978-0-8122-1747-6.
- Price, Daniel E. (1999). Islamic political culture, democracy, and human rights: a comparative study. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-275-96187-9.
- Williams, Paul (1981). The International bill of human rights. United Nations General Assembly. Entwhistle Books. ISBN 978-0-934558-07-5.
Further reading[edit]
- Feldman, Jean-Philippe. "Hayek's Critique Of The Universal Declaration Of Human Rights". Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Volume 9, Issue 4 (December 1999): 1145-6396.
- Nurser, John. "For All Peoples and All Nations. Christian Churches and Human Rights.". (Geneva: WCC Publications, 2005).
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights pages at Columbia University (Centre for the Study of Human Rights), including article by article commentary, video interviews, discussion of meaning, drafting and history.
- Introductory note by Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade and procedural history on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in the Historic Archives of the United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law
External links[edit]
This article's use of external links may not follow Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. (November 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)Wikiquote has quotations related to: Universal Declaration of Human Rights Wikimedia Commons has media related to Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Wikiversity has learning resources about Assessing Human Rights - UN Member States
- Text of the UDHR
- Official translations of the UDHR
- Resource Guide on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights at the UN Library, Geneva.
- Drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights - documents and meetings records — United Nations Dag Hammarskjöld Library
- Questions and answers about the Universal Declaration
- Text, Audio, and Video excerpt of Eleanor Roosevelt's Address to the United Nations on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- UDHR – Education
- UDHR in Unicode
- Revista Envío – A Declaration of Human Rights For the 21st Century
- Introductory note by Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade and procedural history note on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in the Historic Archives of the United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law
- DHpedia: Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- The Laws of Burgos: 500 Years of Human Rights from the Law Library of Congress blog.
Audiovisual materials[edit]
- UDHR Audio/Video Project (recordings in 500+ languages by native speakers)
- Librivox: Human-read audio recordings in several Languages
- Text, Audio, and Video excerpt of Eleanor Roosevelt's Address to the United Nations on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- Animated presentation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by Amnesty International on YouTube (in English duration 20 minutes and 23 seconds).
- Audio: Statement by Charles Malik as Representative of Lebanon to the Third Committee of the UN General Assembly on the Universal Declaration, 6 November 1948
- UN Department of Public Information introduction to the drafters of the Declaration
- Audiovisual material on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in the Historic Archives of the United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law
'사람되기 > 인문학' 카테고리의 다른 글
(인문학) 유엔헌장 및 국제사법재판소 규정 全文 (0) 2018.04.14 (인문학) 허핑톤 포스트: 전 세계 핵무기 현황을 한 장에 담았다(인포그래픽) (0) 2018.03.21 (인문학) 국경 없는 기자회 Reporters Without Borders (0) 2018.02.12 (인문학) 중남미 니카라과의 산디니스타 민족해방전선 (0) 2018.02.10 (인문학) 도서명: <하느님을 기다리는 시간> (0) 2018.01.23